Module 7: Portfolio Milestone

Question Description

Important! Read First

This week you will complete the fourth Milestone that builds towards the completion of your Portfolio Project. Complete the Milestone that corresponds with the Portfolio Project option that you have selected (Option #1 ); it should be the same option number that you completed for previous Milestones. Indicate your selection in the title of your submission.

Option #1: Planning for a PLN or PLE

Create an 8-10 slide presentation (in addition to the required introduction slide and a reference slide) that details a Personal Learning Network (PLN) or a Personal Learning Environment (PLE) that you might create for yourself. Identify social media platforms and tools that you would use, what groups or experts you would like as part of your LPN or PLE, and how you and your online presence would benefit from the PLN or PLE.

Your presentation must be professional in design and academic in writing. Support your recommendations with a minimum of two scholarly sources. Your course texts are a good place to start, and the CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is another good place to find other sources. Your citations and references must be written and formatted according to the requirements in the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.).

You may use PowerPoint or an online slide presentation tool. Be sure to include for your instructor any necessary information for accessing your presentation. Follow the CSU-Global Visual Presentation Tips guidelines at http://csuglobal.libguides.com/CommonWritingAssign/vispresent (Links to an external site.).

Submit your presentation file to your instructor as an attachment. Review the rubric for this Milestone in the Module 7 Materials folder for specific grading criteria.

Rubric

COM340 Mod 7 PM

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSEO, PLN, or PLE: Application and Synthesis

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate application and synthesis of course concepts in the planning or proposing SEO, a PLE, or a PLN. Plan or proposal clearly communicates rationale and benefits to online presence.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in application and synthesis.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in application and synthesis.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate application and synthesis.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 40.0



^{Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."}